Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 vs Kodak Ultramax 400 Film Stock Comparison by Amy Elizabeth

Waterfall - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film
This post may contain affiliate links. If you click on a link and make a purchase, Shoot It With Film may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you.

Written by Amy Elizabeth

It’s no secret I LOVE consumer films. I even use them for client work because I have so much love for their punchy colors, high contrast, chunky grain, and overall nostalgic feel.

Nostalgia is a major goal of the aesthetic of my personal and client work. I think it boils down to the fact that I love photography precisely because it’s capturing the memories that would all-too-quickly fade without them. But I digress.

All this being said, the two films I shoot with the absolute most are Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 (find on Amazon) and Kodak Ultramax 400 (find on Amazon).

I have noticed differences between them because I shoot with them so often, but I was curious to use Fuji Superia and Kodak Ultramax side-by-side to note the direct comparisons.

Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 vs Kodak Ultramax 400 Film Stock Comparison
Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 vs Kodak Ultramax 400 Film Stock Comparison
Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 vs Kodak Ultramax 400 Film Stock Comparison
Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 vs Kodak Ultramax 400 Film Stock Comparison
Waterfalls - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

Setting Up the Comparison Between Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 and Kodak Ultramax 400

I followed the format of my last film stock comparison between Kodak Tri-X, Kodak TMax 400, and Ilford HP5+ 400 by taking some shots outside, inside, with studio lighting, and of landscapes. .

(Last time was cityscapes, but the goal was to incorporate something without my kiddos in them.)

You can also find a film comparison between Kodak UltraMax and Kodak Gold here.

Camera Settings

I took the films and put them in my double harness with Nikon N80 on one hip and Nikon F100 on the other.

I used the same focal lengths for both cameras and used the same settings for both. (The Nikon N80 has some funny values, but, for all intents and purposes, they were the same settings.)

I rated them both at 400 (even though I usually rate Superia at 200), so I really just had to meter with one camera and set both cameras and shoot away.

Developing and Scanning

I developed the Fuji Superia and the Kodak Ultramax at the same time in my C-41 powder kit from the Film Photography Store. I admit that the chemicals weren’t at their freshest (they had been used to develop 16 rolls beforehand), but these results were extremely consistent with results I get when using fresh chemicals.

I frequently use my chemicals until I’ve developed around 18 rolls. Then, I use them for film I have souped or sometimes to cross-process.

I then used my Noritsu LS-600 (find on eBay) to scan both rolls. I pulled both rolls into Lightroom to make adjustments to temp and tint, and a little exposure adjustments as I normally would.

Family Camping - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film
Grab your free copy of the Shoot It With Film magazine!

A Disclaimer about Film Comparisons

For me, this was about comparing apples to apples. This is why I edited/adjusted the photos as I normally would.

I wanted to compare Fuji Superia and Kodak Ultramax after following my typical steps with my own developing, scanning, and light editing processes.

Your lab’s or your own chemicals, scanner, color process, etc, might be wildly different, so take these with a grain of salt.

There are so many variables to consider when comparing these two films. Below you will find MY experience with these films, and I would love to hear about yours in the comments.

Children Walking Down Sidewalk - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

Fuji Superia VS Kodak Ultramax: The Results

Which Film Likes More Light?

I normally give more exposure to my Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 than I did during this experiment, because I find it’s a rather light-hungry film.

I found this wasn’t as noticeable in most of the shots, except when it came to back-lighting.

The shot of my son on our back stoop showed his skin to be a little muddy, and I think it could have benefited from a little more exposure to light. (As a reminder, I metered once at 400 ISO and set both of my cameras to the same settings.)

Child on Stoop - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

You can also see Superia X-TRA is a more light-hungry film in the shot of my youngest son at our window.

I metered for shadows, and the highlights are less blown out on Fuji Superia X-TRA than they are on Kodak Ultramax 400 indicating that Superia XTRA liked having that extra light, while Ultramax did not.

Indoor Portrait of Child - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

Color Tone Comparison

The most noticeable difference between Fuji Superia and Kodak Ultramax is the in the orange channel. Superia renders those colors (especially seen in the shadows) as greener, while Ultramax renders them as more magenta.

Notice the trees, with the trunks of trees on Superia looking greener and Ultramax being redder, meaning Ultramax has greater distinction between the leaves and the trunk/branches than Superia has.

Family Hiking in the Woods - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film
Waterfalls - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

You can also see these qualities in the images with the wooden fence and even in the images in the concrete where my son is on our stoop.

Child on Stoop - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

The green tint of Superia and red tint in Ultramax also play out in their renderings of the blue channel.

Notice the wading pool my son is playing in; the blues (especially darker blues) read greener with Superia and more red with Ultramax, creating a more purple effect.

Child Outside in Kiddie Pool - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film
Child Outside in Kiddie Pool - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

My family apparently wears A LOT of blue, so you can see this color difference in my husband’s blue outfit, my eldest son’s, my middle son’s shirt, AND youngest one’s shorts ?

Family Camping - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

Skin Tone Comparison

My children are pale, and their skin tones are rendered very different between these two films.

Fuji Superia is known as a punchier stock and you can see the pinkiness in their skin being exacerbated, while Kodak Ultramax gives them more even skin coloring.

Child Outside - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

The preference for one vs the other is often a personal one, but sometimes situational.

I oftentimes like the pink tones added especially to their cheeks with Superia, but, in the image where my son is inside, you can see the pink skin looks more unnatural than the even tones in Ultramax.

(Yet again, this is partially due to the fact that Superia likes more light, and that shadowy side of his face could have used some greater exposure.)

Indoor Portrait of Child - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

I admit I grab for Superia more often because of its punchy colors and “off” tones, but Ultramax’s even tones and truer-to-life coloring (this might be debatable, but I’m going to go ahead and say it) have its own appeal, time, and place in my film repertoire.

Indoor Portrait of Two Children - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

Grain Comparison

I realize I haven’t touched on grain yet. Mostly, because there’s not much to say about it. Yes, these films are grainier than other 400 films (read: pro films) like Kodak Portra 400 or Fuji Pro 400h.

The difference between Fuji Superia and Kodak Ultramax is minor in the grand scheme of things.

From this set of scans, Ultramax appears to have a little less grain (especially in the highlights), but then again I often expose Superia more than I did here, which results in less noticeable grain.

You don’t shoot these films if you hate grain. (I LOVE grain). But, then again, you don’t shoot 35mm if you hate grain.

I say we learn to embrace the grain and the character that comes with it, but I admit pixel-peeping never was my thing. I’m not a big “smooth and sharp” person as I feel the grittiness of film gives a unique character, story, and nostalgia.

Child Outside at BBQ - Fuji Superia vs Kodak Ultramax Film Stock Comparison by Amy Berge on Shoot It With Film

Final Thoughts

Ultimately, I love consumer film and always encourage people to shoot it, especially if they’re newer to film.

The best way to learn about film is to shoot a lot of it, and the price point of both Fuji Superia and Kodak Ultramax makes it much more feasible to shoot and learn than a pricier pro film.

My style of color film shooting is bright and colorful (which is maybe ironic because I also LOVE shooting black and white), and these consumer films lend themselves perfectly to this style.

Long live consumer film!

Thank you so much, Amy! Amy is a regular contributor here at Shoot It With Film, and you can check out her other articles here, including B&W Film Stock Comparison and Scanning Film Negatives with a DSLR!

To see more of Amy’s work, be sure to visit her on her website and Instagram! Amy also shares tips and tutorials for shooting film over on her IGTV channel. Go check it out!

Leave your questions about Fuji Superia XTRA 400 and Kodak Ultramax 400 below in the comments, and you can pick up some for yourself on Amazon here: Fuj Superia X-TRA 400 and Kodak Ultramax 400

Shoot It With Film Magazine Issue 01 Promo Image

Amy Elizabeth

Amy Elizabeth is a family and experimental film photographer and a regular contributor for Shoot It With Film. Find her other articles here, such as How To Develop Black and White Film at Home and Scanning Film Negatives with a DSLR.

Tags:
Blog Comments

Thank you for this film comparison.
You mention in the article that you generally rate Superia at 200. Do you then pull the film one stop when processing, or is it simply a one-stop overexposure? (i.e. rating 400 film at 200 = 2x exposure time, all else equal) I also find Superia at box speed results in pink skin tones. Would you say the same applies to Pro 400H (i.e. rate it at 200)?
Thanks again for this very informative article!

Thank you for helping me confirm my suspicions about superia 400, I understand it’s a little bit more light hungry than most it’s range, but I really dislike that green cast but it gives certain tones like you mentioned. I think I just prefer the ultra max colors and warmer tones. Some thing about it is more nostalgic – I believe that’s what my parents shot all of my baby pictures on as well – so definitely not biased here!

Regarding scanning your color film, do you ever convert to B&W and which color film seems to work best for this process?
Thanks
FW

Hi Frank! I don’t shoot color with the intent of converting it to BW, but I will occasionally convert a frame if the exposure is off. If you’re wanting to shoot a color process film, try Ilford XP-2! It’s a black and white film that gets developed in C41 chemicals! Hope that helps!

Leave a Comment