Shooting Film on a Budget: Black and White Films Under $10 by Taylor Blanchard

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
This post may contain affiliate links. If you click on a link and make a purchase, Shoot It With Film may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you.

Written by Taylor Blanchard

While we all love to complain about the price of film, and the cost of film photography is the subject of plenty of memes, there is still a wide selection of negative film options under $10 (or very close to that). In part one of a two-part series, I explore the best budget-friendly black and white film stocks. Stay tuned for part two on color films.

Apologies for our readers outside of the U.S., where prices may not align to what we’re sharing here. If you’re outside of the U.S., please share your best value black & white films in the comments.

The stocks are arranged below from least expensive to most expensive. For this article, I searched prices across online retailers. You may find these films at better (or worse!) prices locally, on sale, or on auction/resale sites. One thing is certain: it’s a good idea to shop around.

Note: Kodak Alaris, which distributes Tri-X and T-MAX, recently raised prices, so those find may no longer less than $10.

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kentmere 400

Fomapan 100, 200, and 400

By far one of the most affordable films you can find is made by Foma. Based in the Czech Republic, Foma Bohemia is a company with a history dating back to 1921, and they make negative and reversal black and white films, darkroom paper, and chemistry.

Foma offers three speeds of their black and white negative film with fun names:  Fomapan 100 Classic; Fomapan 200 Creative; and Fomapan 400 Action.

That unique look comes from the grain. In 100 and 400, it’s a cubic grain like Kodak Tri-X, making Foma films chunkier and more noticeable than other black and white films. An interesting note is that the 200 speed film uses a tabular grain, like Kodak T-MAX films; however, the grain is not as smooth as T-MAX.

I’ve found Foma films to have a bit less exposure latitude than other black and white films, although they’re still quite forgiving. You may notice this most in the shadow details.

I’ve shot all three of these films over many years, and I tend to reach for one when I want to try something creative.

It’s a film I love to shoot in my Holga, where its chunkier grain and texture are right at home. I purposely have shot it in my pinhole where I wanted a film with terrible reciprocity characteristics (I wanted very long exposure times of more than 10 minutes at sunset). In lower light and longer exposures, you may want to give Foma films extra exposure time. Check the datasheet or a reciprocity app.

Foma also makes the Holga 400 film, which is similarly priced.

Find Fomapan 100, 200, and 400 film on Amazon here.

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Photo by Marc Atwood | Fomapan 200
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Fomapan 200
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Fomapan 400
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Holga 400 film (aka Foma)
Grab your free copy of the Shoot It With Film magazine!

Arista EDU 100 and 400

Arista is the house brand of Freestyle Photographic, but you can find it at other retailers. You can also find paper and chemistry under the Arista brand. The EDU in the name stands for education, branding itself as a film geared to students and educators.

I’m giving Arista its own entry even though it’s widely discussed that Arista is made by Foma. Why? First, Arista is generally a tad cheaper than Foma. Second, several films have been available under the Arista name over the years, and not all have been Foma. For example, Arista started selling a 35mm cartridge that is DX coded and made in the UK (not in the Czech Republic). They briefly sold Arista Pan 100, which some thought was made by Orwo in Germany. Years ago, Arista also sold a Premium brand, which was rumored to be Kodak Tri-X.

Because of possible variations in the film, I have a difficult time giving any specific guidance on shooting it. I would buy Arista because of the price, not because you think you’re getting a specific film.

Read more about Arista 100 here and Arista 400 here.

Find Arista EDU 100 and 400 film at B&H Photo here.

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Arista EDU 100
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Arista EDU 100

Kentmere 100, 200, and 400

Ilford makes the Kentmere line, which is often recommended for students, educators, and beginners. A few years ago, Ilford released Kentmere in medium format, and then in 2025, Kentmere added 200 speed film to its lineup, which had previously included 100 and 400.

Kentmere films have a very forgiving exposure latitude, which is one of the reasons they’re recommended for beginners. I’ve also had great luck with Kentmere films in my Holga because of the exposure latitude.

The 100 and 400 films are lower in contrast and will require work if you want a punchier look. When released, Ilford said the newer 200 speed is a higher contrast film

Find Kentmere 100, 200, and 400 film on Amazon and at B&H Photo.

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kentmere 100
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kentmere 200
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kentmere 400
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kentmere 400

Ilford HP5+

Ilford HP5+ is a powerhouse film, and understandably one of the most popular black and white films. It’s so versatile: excellent at box speed, and a film known for pulling and pushing capabilities.

It has a wide latitude and excellent tonal range, giving you a lot to work with. The grain is exactly what you would want from a 400 speed film: noticeable but not distracting. In fact, I haven’t found grain to be a concern on HP5+ until pushing it past 3 stops.

The cost can vary quite a bit among retailers, so I would recommend shopping around.

Read more about Ilford HP5+ here.

Find Ilford HP5+ film on Amazon here.

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Ilford HP5+
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Ilford HP5+

Kodak Tri-X 400

Kodak Tri-X is a well-covered film on this site, and one I’ve tested against T-MAX 400 in several lighting conditions, pulling and pushing it. Honestly, what can I even say about Kodak Tri-X that hasn’t been said before?

If you’ve never shot any of these black and white films, Tri-X is a great place to start. It gives a classic film look with a pleasing, but noticeable grain. It handles different lighting conditions like a champ and pushes well.

It has a classic look coveted by street and concert photographers. With a history dating back more than 70 years, Kodak has kept it part of its lineup for a reason.

Read more about Kodak Tri-X here.

Find Kodak Tri-X 400 film on Amazon here.

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kodak Tri-X
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kodak Tri-X
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kodak Tri-X

Kodak T-MAX 100 and 400

Kodak T-MAX barely makes the cut, often exceeding our budget-friendly threshold for this article. My guess is that its tabular grain structure is more expensive to manufacture. T-MAX, available in 100 and 400, has a very smooth grain structure and is very high resolution.

Even at the faster 400 speed, it’s a film to shoot when you don’t want very noticeable grain. Many people use T-MAX films for testing their lenses, so if you have high quality glass, it’s an excellent choice. I would not recommend T-MAX for testing a camera or any experimental purposes.

Maybe because of its higher price tag, it never seems as generally popular as its Tri-X cousin.

Find Kodak T-MAX 100 and 400 film on Amazon here.

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kodak T-MAX 400
Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kodak T-MAX 400

What’s Your Go-To?

At the cheaper end of the spectrum, you might not get as much exposure latitude and you may notice more grain. In many cases, those trade-offs are worth saving a few dollars.

At the higher end of our film range, we get classic black and white films that are some of the most popular and enduring film stocks.

Many of these black and white films are available in 35mm 100-foot rolls, where you can load yourself into previously used canisters, further stretching your film budget.

What is your go-to black and white film on a budget?

Budget Friendly BW Film by Taylor Blanchard on Shoot It With Film
Kodak Tri-X

Thank you so much, Taylor! Taylor is a regular contributor here at Shoot It With Film, and you can check out her other articles here, such as Pentax 17 Review and Pushing Film to the Limit: Ilford HP5+ Pushed 3, 4, & 5 Stops.

You can also check out more of Taylor’s work on Instagram.

Leave your questions about budget friendly b&w film stocks below in the comments, and you can pick some up for yourself here on Amazon.

Shoot It With Film Magazine Issue 01 Promo Image

Taylor Blanchard

Taylor Blanchard is a landscape and travel film photographer and a regular contributor for Shoot It With Film. Find her other articles here, such as My Foray Into Large Format Photography and The World of Infrared and Red-Sensitive Black and White Film.

Image Credit: Ashley Thalman

Tags:
Blog Comments

Great article, Taylor! Yeah, film prices are really up there… especially to someone like me who’s been shooting since the sixties.

But a quick look at B&H and several other major dealers indicates that many great emulsions can still be had for under $10… for 24-exposure rolls.

I’ve shot 24-exp rolls most of my life. (And before that, 20-exps when they were the standard shorter roll.) I especially like them in my half-frame cameras, where they typically yield around 55 negs. But I’m not a big film burner even with my full-frame cameras, and I mainly shoot 24-exps in them too.

The only one of the budget films you discuss here that I’ve tried in recent years is Kentmere Pan 100… and after a lifetime of shooting premium films, I was disappointed. As you observed, its contrast is weak – it looked very flat developed in D-76 1:1, and frankly I didn’t think its grain was as tight as a 100-speed film’s should be.

A gorgeous b/w film that I heartily recommend is Kodak Double-X (Eastman 5222) – still $8.99 for a 24-exp as “X2” at Film Photography Project. With its formula unchanged since it was introduced in 1959, Double-X looks way more like 1960s Tri-X than today’s Tri-X does. And it has excellent exposure latitude, I mainly shoot it Sunny 16 with great results.

You know, as someone who was pretty convinced that b/w film photography was dying 15 years ago when I liquidated my parents studio and couldn’t give film equipment away, I’m astonished with how many b/w emulsions are on the market these days… Though I’d trade a bunch of them to get back lost favorites like Plus-X and the original Agfapan APX 100.

Anyway, great article!

Great info Taylor! I bought a bulk loader a few years ago and got Kentmere 400 right now. it’s nice to do smaller rolls or bigger rolls if I want and a lot cheaper. Keep an eye out for sales also, last year I got some Kentmere 400 in 120 for under $6 at B&H. Like you said contrast is low but always got good results after a little editing. Delta 3200 is awesome but can’t afford it all the time 😄 I have seen people push Kentmere 400 3 stops and it still looks good!

Hi Justin – always great to great from you! Bulk loading is always on my list of things to start doing, yet here I am not bulk rolling. I really love the idea of being able to roll shorter rolls as you say. One day! It’s definitely a great way to spend less on film.

Michael – thank you so much for reading and taking the time to comment. You’re the second person to recommend the Double X to me – I will definitely check it out.

Taylor, I got a bulk loader back in the ’70s, and never bought individual rolls of B+W film again!
I prefer 24-exposures per roll, and get ~24 rolls from a bulk can. (I’ ve heard you can get 18 36-exp. rolls per bulk can.)
So, B&H has bulk Arista 400 for ~$85, which gives me (taking off shoes) about $3.55 per 24-shot roll.
Definitely worth it!

Hi Rich – I am sure it’s tough to go back to buying individual rolls after bulk rolling! That price for a 100ft roll is tough to beat. Thank you so much for the comment. 🙂

A good article Taylor. I’m assuming all the films you tested in your article were 35mm. The best way to reduce the cost of 35mm is to purchase 30m rolls and self-load. This reduces the cost considerably and the cost of a bulk film loader is easily compensated the more film you bulk load. This includes transparency film. A word of caution though: Only re-use a cassette twice, maybe three times. Re-using a cassette more than that many times increases the risk of ‘tram-tracks’ caused by small dust particles settling in the felt of the cassette mouth. Your local film processor will more than likely be pleased to give you as many used film cassettes as you want. Another cost-reduction tip: process your own b&w film, then select only those frames you want to print then give this to your film processor. Of course, you can go the whole hog: get some basic darkroom gear and print your own photos, even if it’s just blacking out the laundry windows to achieve a light-tight working area. I’ve been developing and printing my own negs for about 60 years, that for many years includes not only 35mm, but 120/220 roll film, 4″x5″ and 8″x10″.

Ray – Thank you for the comments. Actually, most of these films are medium format, which is my favorite format. Shot across Pentax645nii, multiple Holgas, Zero Image Pinhole 6×9, and a Rolleiflex MX-EVS. If you see my other articles, I already develop my own film (b&w and color) and print in the darkroom (b&w)! 🙂 I also shoot 4×5 and have yet to dive into 8×10 (and have a few articles about shooting 4×5). That said, I appreciate the tips about bulk rolling. As I told Justin, this has been on my list to do for many years…

Leave a Comment